There are Classic Bad Products, such as “New Coke” and “Ben-Gay Aspirin”. There are also horribly bad Tech Products, such as “RealPlayer” and “SoftRAM”. There are few things they have in common:They often “borrow” from another brand (Brand/Line extension), such as Ben-Gay Aspririn.
- They often “do not perform as advertised”, or are otherwise misleading such as SoftRam
- They sometimes are just so annoying to use and so invasive that they are not worth the hassle, such as RealPlayer.
- Often, they are all 3!
- New Coke.
- this is a ‘brand extension’… and uses the new coke brand…. unfortunately Coke tried to make “ALL MARKET” accept this as a brand replacement. (Bad Idea!)
- As a brand extension though, New Coke, could have been marketed beside “Coke” as a different flavor, a flavor targeted at younger folks, or targeted at Pepsi lovers.
- Given that kind of target market, it might have found a niche.
- Microsoft Zune.
- Microsoft COULD have carved out a DIFFERENT target market or audience with Zune. E.g. perhaps Zune was an MP3 Player for Senior Citizens?
- Ironically, marketed like that you might have charged “more” for the Zune.
- SoftRAM.
- Yes, it mislead folks about that it was… but… it also kinda-worked!
- SoftRAM could have priced itself as a $0.99 utility to tweak Windows.
- They might have sold Millions! (and not been the target of FTC investigations).
- The could have targeted people with extra HD capacity…. or perhaps Housewives… or ‘old PC owners’….
- Being HONEST about what they are and are not would have been key
- Canned Chicken – It’s disgusting. I am not in the target market.
- Windows Mouse – It was terrible, and required a driver install. Utter fail. Not worth the price.
- Thin Black Socks – They are uncomfortable and do not last long. Hate those socks (I’m not the target market)
- Playstation 3 – Horrible quality. Breaks so easy. Not worth the price.